Blog
Google Drive wasn't built for large files

Google Drive is excellent for documents and spreadsheets, but it starts to buckle under the weight of video, design, and media files.
Google Drive is one of the most widely used cloud storage services in the world, and for good reason. It integrates tightly with Gmail, Google Docs, and Sheets. It makes lightweight collaboration easy. For text-based documents, spreadsheets, and slide decks, it does the job well and has done so for over a decade.
But the moment your work involves large files, Google Drive begins to show its limits. Video editors, photographers, designers, architects, and 3D artists all run into the same set of problems. Uploads stall or fail. The sync client chews through local disk space. Search only looks at filenames and text content. Previews for media files are either absent or unreliable. And the 15 GB free tier, shared across Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Photos, fills up before you've stored anything substantial.
These are not edge cases. They are the daily reality for anyone whose work produces files measured in gigabytes rather than kilobytes.
The upload ceiling
Google Drive's official maximum file size is 5 TB, but in practice, uploads above a few gigabytes become unreliable. Large video exports, RAW photo batches, and design project archives frequently stall mid-upload, forcing you to start again. Browser-based uploads are particularly fragile; a brief network interruption can undo minutes or hours of progress.
For video editors working with 4K or 8K footage, a single timeline export can run to tens of gigabytes. Uploading that to Google Drive often means babysitting the process, retrying when it fails, and hoping nothing corrupts along the way. The experience is tolerable for a one-off, but it does not scale to a daily workflow where large exports are routine.
Sync downloads everything
Google Drive's desktop application, Drive for Desktop, gives you two main options: streaming and mirroring. In mirror mode, files are downloaded to your local drive in full, which defeats the purpose of cloud storage for anyone with a large library. Streaming mode is meant to solve this by keeping files in the cloud until you open them, but in practice it is inconsistent. Files that were accessed once may linger on disk. The client sometimes pre-fetches content you did not request. And switching between modes can trigger a full re-sync of your library.
The result is that your laptop fills up with cached copies of files you may not need right now, while the files you do need take time to download on demand. For creative professionals with terabytes of assets, this tug-of-war between local storage and cloud access is a constant friction point.
Fabric takes a different approach entirely. Its cloud drive streams files on demand without syncing them to your local disk. Files appear as if they are local, but they live in the cloud and consume zero local storage. There is no mirror-versus-stream toggle to configure, no cache to manage, and no risk of filling your SSD with files you opened once three months ago.
Search that only sees filenames
Google Drive's search is fast and functional for documents. It indexes the text content of Google Docs, Sheets, PDFs, and some other text-based formats. If you remember a phrase from a document, you can find it quickly.
But for images, videos, audio files, and design assets, Google Drive search is limited to filenames, folder names, and basic metadata. If you named a file "IMG_4392.CR2" or "final_v3_revised.psd," good luck finding it later without scrolling through folders manually.
This is a fundamental gap for media-heavy workflows. A photographer returning to a shoot from six months ago may remember the mood, the location, or the subject, but not the filename. A designer looking for a particular brand asset may know what it looks like but not where it was filed.
Semantic search closes this gap by letting you describe what you are looking for rather than requiring you to remember what you named it. Fabric's search understands the content and context of your files, so a query like "product photos from the Berlin shoot" or "logo with the blue gradient" returns relevant results even if none of those words appear in the filename.
Organisation is manual
Google Drive relies on a folder-based hierarchy. You create folders, drag files into them, and maintain the structure yourself. This works well enough when your library is small, but it becomes a burden as your collection grows. Files end up in the wrong folder, duplicates accumulate, and the folder tree becomes so deep that navigating it takes longer than the work itself.
For teams, the problem is worse. Different people have different filing habits, and shared drives often become disorganised within weeks. The lack of any content-aware filing means that a video, a script, and a thumbnail for the same project may end up in three different locations with no obvious connection between them.
Fabric's smart organisation auto-categorises files based on their content, not just their name or the folder you put them in. Related files are grouped together without you having to drag them into place. This is particularly useful for creative asset management, where projects generate dozens of file types that all belong together.
Limited media previews
Google Drive can preview common document and image formats in the browser. But support for video files, layered design files, RAW photos, and 3D assets is patchy at best. Large video files often fail to generate a preview at all. PSD and AI files may show a flattened thumbnail but nothing more. Formats like .blend, .c4d, or .3dm are not previewable.
For teams doing review and approval work, this means downloading files to preview them locally. That adds time, consumes bandwidth, and requires that each reviewer has the right software installed. It is an awkward loop for something that should be as simple as clicking a file and seeing what is inside.
Fabric supports annotations directly on images, video, and audio files. You can draw on an image, leave timestamped comments on a video timeline, or mark up a design file, all without downloading anything or switching to a separate review tool.
The 15 GB ceiling
Google Drive's free tier offers 15 GB of storage, shared across Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Photos. For someone working primarily in Google Docs, this is generous. For anyone dealing with media files, it runs out almost immediately.
A single 4K video export can consume a significant portion of that 15 GB allocation. A modest collection of RAW photos from one shoot can exceed it entirely. Paid plans expand the limit, but even the 2 TB Google One tier fills up quickly for photographers and designers with active libraries.
Fabric's approach sidesteps this constraint. Because files stream on demand rather than syncing, your local storage is not the bottleneck. And because Fabric supports connections to existing cloud storage services like Google Drive and Dropbox, you can bring your existing files into Fabric without migrating them. Your storage provider handles the bytes; Fabric handles the experience on top.
Collaboration on media files
Google Drive's collaboration features are strong for documents. Real-time co-editing in Google Docs is one of the best implementations anywhere. But collaboration on media files is another story. There is no built-in way to annotate a video with timecoded feedback, mark up a design comp, or leave contextual comments on a photograph. Teams resort to separate tools, email threads, or spreadsheets to manage feedback on visual work.
Fabric's collaboration features extend to media files natively. Timestamped comments, visual annotations, and threaded discussions are built into the file experience rather than bolted on through third-party integrations. For agencies and creative teams that spend significant time in review cycles, this removes an entire layer of tool-switching.
When Google Drive is the right choice
Google Drive remains an excellent choice for teams that work primarily in Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides. Its real-time co-editing is best in class. Its integration with the broader Google ecosystem is seamless. And for small-to-medium document libraries, the free and paid tiers offer plenty of room.
The gap appears when your workflow includes large files, media-heavy projects, or asset libraries that grow over time. If you find yourself fighting with uploads, running out of disk space, or scrolling through folders to find the right version of a file, the tool may not be the right fit for that part of your work.
A detailed feature-by-feature breakdown is available on the Fabric vs Google Drive comparison page.
A cloud drive built for large files
Fabric was designed from the start for workflows where files are large and plentiful. Its cloud drive streams content on demand, its search understands what your files contain, and its organisation keeps your library tidy without manual effort. It also works alongside your existing storage, so you do not have to choose between tools. You can connect Google Drive to Fabric and get semantic search and smart organisation on top of the files you already have.
For anyone whose work lives in video timelines, design canvases, photo libraries, or 3D environments, the difference between a document-centric cloud drive and one built for large files is the difference between a tool that helps and one that gets in the way.
Frequently asked questions
What is the maximum file size you can upload to Google Drive?
Google Drive's stated maximum is 5 TB per file, but uploads above a few gigabytes are often unreliable, particularly through the browser. Large uploads may stall, time out, or need to be restarted. Fabric's cloud drive handles large files natively, streaming them on demand without requiring a full upload-then-download cycle.
Why is Google Drive so slow with large files?
Google Drive was optimised for documents and lightweight collaboration. Its upload infrastructure, sync client, and preview system were designed around small files. Large video, design, and photography files push it beyond its comfortable range, resulting in slow uploads, sluggish sync, and missing previews.
Does Google Drive download files to my computer?
In mirror mode, yes. In streaming mode, files are meant to stay in the cloud until opened, but the client often caches more than expected. Fabric's cloud drive avoids this entirely; files stream on demand and do not consume local storage.
Can Google Drive search inside images and videos?
Google Drive's search is limited to filenames, folder names, and the text content of documents and PDFs. It does not understand the visual content of images or the contents of video files. Fabric's semantic search lets you describe what you are looking for in plain language.
Is Google Drive good for video editors?
Google Drive can store video files, but it is not designed for video workflows. Uploads are slow, previews are unreliable for large files, and there is no way to leave timecoded feedback. Fabric supports timestamped annotations on video files and streams footage on demand without filling your local drive.
How much free storage does Google Drive give you?
Google Drive offers 15 GB of free storage, shared across Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Photos. For media-heavy workflows, this fills up quickly. Paid Google One plans range from 100 GB to 2 TB.
Can I use Google Drive and Fabric together?
Yes. Fabric supports connections to Google Drive, so you can access your existing files through Fabric without migrating them. This gives you semantic search, smart organisation, and annotations on top of your current Google Drive library.
What is the best Google Drive alternative for large files?
The best alternative depends on your workflow. For media-heavy work involving video, photography, design, or 3D assets, Fabric's cloud drive is purpose-built for large files. It streams on demand, searches by content, and organises files automatically. You can explore plans on the pricing page for individuals or for teams.
Related pages
Other blog posts:

Dropbox is eating your disk space

Google Drive wasn't built for large files

iCloud is not a real backup strategy

How much cloud storage do you actually need?

NAS vs cloud for creative teams in 2026

Syncing a game build across your team without Perforce

Your texture library needs a real home

Blender files are getting bigger and your workflow isn't keeping up